Re: TI-H: mp3
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: mp3
>ya, very small world
>
>well it is a 486 33 SX
>
>joe
>
>PS. the sys. I use most of the time is my AMD K6-300
Thats probably something like, 30 seconds a song?
>Bryan Rittmeyer wrote:
>
>> Joseph M. Geiss wrote:
>>
>> > yah, its easy to compress it but, damn, its a pain to decompress(play)
>>it on a
>> > slow computer.
>>
>> Actually it takes a lot more CPU time to compress than to decompress.
>> Only
>> decompression has to be realtime, so it can seem more demanding. You can
>> compress an mp3 on an old 386 if you want, it'll just take a few weeks
>> :)
>>
>> > I have an old 486 laptop that i use every so often and it takes like
>>10min to load
>> > a damn file.
>>
>> Really? There shouldn't be much of a 'load' time associated with an
>> mp3.. it usually
>> loads a small amount of the file into DRAM at a time, as it plays.
>>
>> > I read in some artice that MP4 would be 2x of MP3, 500K/min. with the
>>same quality
>> > as mp3. seems to good to be true... time will tell
>>
>> Yeah, but MP4 will require even more CPU power to encode/decode.
>>
>> Do you live in the Baltimore area? Your e-mail address is from a local
>> library...
>> I'm up in Westminster. Small world, huh? :)
>>
>> --
>> Bryan Rittmeyer
>> mailto:bryanr@flash.net
>> http://www.flash.net/~bryanr/
References: