Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer

Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Dan <danti@applecyber.dyndns.com>
• Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 17:27:12 -0500
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <v04020a04b2a1c1999eaa@[24.237.1.209]>
• References: <3.0.6.32.19981219144742.007bb9c0@gussie.alaska.net> <19981219100900.C10584@morph.localnet.net> <3.0.6.32.19981218232527.007bb9e0@gussie.alaska.net> <93a8ec4e.367a874a@aol.com> <3.0.6.32.19981218232527.007bb9e0@gussie.alaska.net>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

The computer wouldn't use RISC, CISC, or SISC or anything... it would make
its own "thing" and I doubt it would even be called a processor in its own
terms.

At 11:49 AM 12/19/98 -0900, you wrote:
>
>>Well... how are you going to change the mood of a computer? Remove some of
>>its RAM? Aww poor P350... Used to have 128MB PC 100 SDRAM and now it has
>>16Megs of plain SIMM... so it will get pissed and hack its way into the
>>soviet missle centre and start a war with america? hehe! Oh yea... Clinton
>>was impeached!!!
>
>impeechment doesn't mean a thing.  he still has to go to trial.
>
>to make it happy, give it a risc processor.  Not found with a leading P.
>
>
-Dan

• Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

• Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Dan <danti@applecyber.dyndns.com>
• Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Jon Olson <morph@jmss.com>
• Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Dan <danti@applecyber.dyndns.com>
• Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: SHIVANJJS@aol.com
• Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

• Prev: Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• Next: Re: TI-H: Demolition Calc
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread