RE: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i ne

RE: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: RE: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• From: Rosyna <rosyna@earthlink.net>
• Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 06:44:56 -0700
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <002501be23f5$9add32e0$d23ca3ce@miltc.hevanet.com>
• Mime: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 4.2mach v148)
• References: <v04103601b294f3a6d484@[153.35.156.96]>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

Thats what I mean, I think. This makes VJ++ useless and most java 
programs for windows will not run without MS's Special brand on Java. 
And did you notice Sun is now allowing other companies to do what MS 
did with Java2?

At approximately 8:28 PM -0800 on the day Earth People call 12/9/98, 
you declared:

> You're wrong.  They just had to modify the code in their Java VM to be
> compliant w/ Sun's spec.  See News.com for more details.  Do a search for
> "java sun microsoft court"

---
I pledge allegiance to the Mac of Apple Computer Incorporated, and to 
the developers for which it stands, one platform, under Jobs, 
indestructible, with creativity and multimedia for all. 

• Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• From: Rosyna <rosyna@earthlink.net>
• RE: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• From: "Bruce Christensen" <bruce@iname.com>

• Prev: Re(2): TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• Next: Re: TI-H: Semi-OT: Robotics
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread