RE: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i nee

RE: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)

• To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: RE: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• From: "Bruce Christensen" <bruce@iname.com>
• Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 20:28:58 -0800
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <v04103601b294f3a6d484@[153.35.156.96]>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

You're wrong.  They just had to modify the code in their Java VM to be
compliant w/ Sun's spec.  See News.com for more details.  Do a search for
"java sun microsoft court"

Sincerely,

Bruce

--
Bruce Christensen - mailto:bruce@iname.com - ICQ: 12635516
NEW! The Expander 2 - http://www.calamistrum.com/visualdesign/e2/
More than quadruple your TI calculator's memory for under $50

TI Calculator Link Cables - http://www.calamistrum.com/visualdesign/link/
Customer Site - http://www.calamistrum.com/visualdesign/link/customer.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
> [mailto:owner-ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Rosyna
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 1998 7:44 PM
> To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining
> message... i need info)
>
>
>
> I thought Microsoft had to abandon all Java development, including
> support in windows and all tools. AM I wrong?

• RE: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• From: Rosyna <rosyna@earthlink.net>

• Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• From: Rosyna <rosyna@earthlink.net>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• Next: Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread