RE: TI-H: gb?

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: RE: TI-H: gb?
From: Dan <danti@applecyber.dyndns.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 22:54:45 -0500
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <v04020a02b292506c168a@[24.237.2.254]>
References: <2FE8CFC38259D211A5FF00104B0A43F70A9C33@BDC_FED>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Well if I was an EE, then I'd understand what you were talking about... but
I'm not, and I'm left clueless as to how to build a Ch3. to Ch1. converter
that allows you to mix in a cable signal... :(

At 06:42 PM 12/7/98 -0900, you wrote:
>
>>If you just use a coil, it will just filter out the stuff you want and
>>only let the
>>stuff on ch 1 (static at this point) through. What Grant said is what is
>>needed,
>>or use some sort of frequency divider and multiplier (like divide by 3
>>and multiply
>>by 2 or something like that) to change the carrier frequency to the
>>desired range
>
>Which would be the best way...  Thats how I do it when I go from 2GHz down
>to 27MHz then it goes to my Rx stage...  Btw, you just get static if you
>build a cel phone tapping device.  :)
>
>Grant
>
>

References:

RE: TI-H: gb?

From: "Jason.Moore" <Jason.Moore@compassh.org>

RE: TI-H: gb?

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

Prev: RE: TI-H: gb?
Next: Re: TI-H: gb?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread