Re: TI-H: Radio Link
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Radio Link
Welp, I unsubscribed from the spam list formerly known
as TI-H, and I know that flash.net has a lot of problems
with e-mail. I should be getting an account at pair.com
soon (for the EII site) and they also give out e-mail.
As for the old firmware that I sent you, that version
was ancient with tons of bugs in the TI send/rec routines...
I had to add quite a few nops to get it slow enough to work
with a 1 MHz crystal... the AVRs are very fast chips!
I'd love to see what you ended up with, if you want to send
me your firmware. I will definitely be finishing the project
myself, and I won't steal your work. You can send it after
I'm done if you want.
I suggest you sell those radio modems as is, with RS-232
support. A lot of people on the list would kill for something
like that for so cheap! Then you could use the EII, or
an AVR-Based graphlink clone (something Grant or I could whip
up in under 10 minutes, no doubt) to convert from TI to RS-232.
The whole goal of the EII is to provide a modular development
platform so that people can realize some of their more
advanced ideas.
You reversed the per-cycle times for the AVR and PIC, by the way.
The PIC is about 200ns, the AVR is around 62.5. Time = 1 / Frequency.
:-)
Just so the rest of the people on the list know, the EII site is now
mirrored at http://www.bridges.edu/horizon/eii/ The site was down
earlier
today due to a nuke (thank the AOL lewzers...) but should be online now.
The horizon.dyn.ml.org/eii/ site still works, and I should have a
www.pair.com
mirror in the future.
Bryan
Grant Stockly wrote:
>
> Does your e-mail still not work bryan? I've tried about 5 times to contact
> you about your beta EII design. Its not the crystal thats too fast, its
> the code... In some places an extra delay routine was needed... Also, one
> of your delay routines didn't take in account that the AVR operates at
> 100nsec and the pic at 62.5 (or close) at 10MHz. Fixing that and a few
> other things made the thing work fine for me...
>
> I guess you are still trying to release it? What evers up with it, I guess
> you and not me are going to release it... Did you realy never get any of
> my e-mails? I've sent you about 5 which told about what was wrong... In
> one of them I enclosed a working firmware design to work with 10MHz.
>
> Basically, if you want, I've got an EII... :) <grant is feeling almighty
> and powerful> <j/k>
>
> >Care to provide us with a phone number and/or
> >URL?
> >
> >Bryan
> >
> >Grant Stockly wrote:
> >>
> >> >>Its a matter of bargining with the company that makes them... I bought
> >> >>one, modified it, and then it worked...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Oh. . .
> >> >
> >> >Maybe I could get one (me where) and pull a Rich and map it out :) Unless
> >> >he wants to do it. . .
> >>
> >> I'm doing that right now... It appears to operate at about 380 MHz so its
> >> probably in the ham radio band somewhere... It is low power enough so taht
> >> you can use it wiothout a lisense though... It is possible to use an amp
> >> to it... :)
References: