Re: TIB: 89 : Assembly Basic (ev. please read)

To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TIB: 89 : Assembly Basic (ev. please read)
From: "Thomas J. Hruska" <thruska@tir.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 23:36:38 -0500
Delivered-To: ti-basic-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <3354c1a8.36c8ac8d@aol.com>
Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org


At 06:23 PM 2/15/99 EST, you wrote:
>In a message dated 2/15/99 6:18:06 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>the_regul8r@bigfoot.com writes:
>
>> >waitkey() would work like getkey() except that it would wait until a
>>  keypress
>>  >to continue
>>  
>>  
>>  It's easy enough to have a getkey loop, ain't it?
>
>yeah, but it does take time for it to go through the loop, and it would
save a
>little power and be more responsive

Also, it would allow for multiple keypress detection.


                 Thomas J. Hruska -- thruska@tir.com
Shining Light Productions -- "Meeting the needs of fellow programmers"
         http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/8504
                    http://click-on.to/shinelight

References:

Re: TIB: 89 : Assembly Basic (ev. please read)

From: TurboSoft@aol.com

Prev: Re: TIB:83 BFS news
Next: Re: TIB: 89 : Assembly Basic (ev. please read)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread