Re: TIB: 89 BASIC better than 86 ASM?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TIB: 89 BASIC better than 86 ASM?
Actually, 92+ and 89 programming should be virtually the same.
--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
File Archives, News, Features, Newsletter, and HTML
the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
On Mon, 28 Sep 1998, The Garth Johnson wrote:
>
> the 92+ has much much much better basic programming than the 85. The
> 89 ought to be the same to the 86.
>
> 92+ programming is much less restricted than 85 programming. same
> should be true for the 89/86
>
>
>
> ---okteam <okteam@ionet.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I was just at ticalc.org and found they had put up screenshots of
> the new 89
> > programs. I wanted to see what they were like, and was amazed at the
> > quality of graphics etc. It seemed to me that the programs (tanks,
> final
> > fantasy VII, down & out) were comparable to some 86 asm programs.
> Of course
> > they are not of a Super Mario/Vertigo caliber, but they appear to
> surpass
> > many programs I have seen for the 86. I am just wondering if the 89
> is that
> > much better than the 86, the games look better than they actually
> are, or if
> > programers just aren't exploiting the 86's capabilities? Maybe it
> is a
> > combination of all three. Just my thoughts.
> >
> >
>
> > -Matt
> >
> >
>
> ==
> The Garth Johnson
>
> Visit my website! http://www.bigfoot.com/~garthjohnson
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
References: