Re: Which TI should I get?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Which TI should I get?
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_=27Deelight=27?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_Jacquot?= <mailto.deelight@USA.NET>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 22:02:57 +0100
Organization: Poulet.org
References: <77b0d4$dp2$1@republic.btigate.com> <19990110231730.13454.00008833@ng112.aol.com> <7816co$5lt$1@nnrp2.dejanews.com>
Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_=27Deelight=27?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_Jacquot?= <mailto.deelight@USA.NET>
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.4
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:27507

Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@mindless.com> wrote:

> In article <19990110231730.13454.00008833@ng112.aol.com>,
>   stl137@aol.com (STL137) wrote:
> > When you divide my PRIME6 times in half (to simulate 4Mhz), you'll
> > see that they are FASTER than the User RPL program. That's my algorithm and
> > TI-BASIC swiftness at work. The other programs are ASM.
>
> Results are the only important thing.

Well then, we don't need to debate. All calculators give the same
results...



















PS: they're just more accurate on a TI

--
Salut, je cherche un bon James Dean pour ricupirer un ornithorynque pour
XPress 4. Bien s{r, il s'agit uniquement d'un lavabo de Schtroumpf.
________________________________________________________________________
Deelight                     passez voir : http://www.chez.com/apfelsaft

Follow-Ups:

Re: Which TI should I get?

From: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>

References:

Re: Which TI should I get?

From: Eric Rechlin <eric@HPCALC.ORGANTISPAM>

Re: Which TI should I get?

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

Re: Which TI should I get?

From: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>

Prev: Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know
Next: Re: Which TI should I get?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread