Re: Which TI should I get?

Re: Which TI should I get?

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: Which TI should I get?
• From: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>
• Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 05:49:11 GMT
• Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
• References: <77b0d4$dp2$1@republic.btigate.com> <19990110231730.13454.00008833@ng112.aol.com>
• Reply-To: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>
• Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:27482

In article <19990110231730.13454.00008833@ng112.aol.com>,
  stl137@aol.com (STL137) wrote:
> When you divide my PRIME6 times in half (to simulate 4Mhz), you'll
> see that they are FASTER than the User RPL program. That's my algorithm and
> TI-BASIC swiftness at work. The other programs are ASM.

Results are the only important thing.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

• Re: Which TI should I get?
• From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>
• Re: Which TI should I get?
• From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_=27Deelight=27?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_Jacquot?= <mailto.deelight@USA.NET>

• Re: Which TI should I get?
• From: Eric Rechlin <eric@HPCALC.ORGANTISPAM>
• Re: Which TI should I get?
• From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

• Prev: Re: I need a new calculator...
• Next: Article re-posted: Erable 3.2 has the fastest LaPlace.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread