Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I

Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know
• From: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>
• Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:08:57 GMT
• Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
• References: <780nbm$psn$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <781c1q$d1j$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
• Reply-To: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>
• Xref: paladin.american.edu comp.sys.hp48:73627 bit.listserv.calc-ti:27495 sci.math:228568

In article <781c1q$d1j$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>,
  Stefan.Ehlen@saw.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
> Are you sure about the price?


Sure I am sure!

I paid:

  230$ for my HP
+ 30$ for my cable
+ 50$ for my RAMCard
+ 0$ for Erable
= 310$ for what you need in HP.

I paid:  234$ for my TI (for I live in the end of the world and FedEx is like
a shark). + 0$ for my own LaPlace formula, which is the best :oD = 234$ for
what you need in TI.

You do NOT need any cable or RAMCard or Library to do LaPlace in TI.

And if you consider that TI89 is like 135$ in the states, then it is actually
less than the half of the price...



-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

• LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know
• From: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>
• Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know
• From: Stefan Ehlen <dean@saw.rwth-aachen.de>

• Prev: Problem with graph-link
• Next: Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread