Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I

Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know
• From: Patrick McGinn <pmcginn@EMAIL.MSN.COM>
• Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 15:54:24 -0500
• References: <780nbm$psn$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <781c1q$d1j$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE> <36A4ADBE.92D37726@baladyne.com> <36A4AE16.3B009925@baladyne.com>
• Reply-To: Patrick McGinn <pmcginn@EMAIL.MSN.COM>
• Xref: paladin.american.edu comp.sys.hp48:73625 bit.listserv.calc-ti:27491 sci.math:228566

>> I bought my ti-89 for $139, which included s&h.  I then bought the cable
>> for $39 at a local store, though the cable is not needed in this case.

If you don't mind my asking, where did you get the 89?  I'm looking to buy
one this week.  Calculator's Inc or whatever it's called looked to have the
best price (133) but I don't think they list the shipping price.

Xaos
80 97 116 114 105 99 107 32 77 99 71 105 110 110

• LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know
• From: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>
• Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know
• From: Stefan Ehlen <dean@saw.rwth-aachen.de>
• Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know
• From: Adam Davis <adavis@BALADYNE.COM>
• Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know
• From: Adam Davis <adavis@BALADYNE.COM>

• Prev: Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know
• Next: Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread