Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco
From: Bernard Parisse <Bernard.Parisse@UJF-GRENOBLE.FR>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:37:11 +0100
Organization: Institut Fourier
References: <77tjoa$53e$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36A37616.DC85C4B5@ujf-grenoble.fr> <78251h$vge$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Reply-To: Bernard Parisse <Bernard.Parisse@UJF-GRENOBLE.FR>
Xref: paladin.american.edu comp.sys.hp48:73622 bit.listserv.calc-ti:27488 sci.math:228563

>
> How do I write this function in Erable
>
> t*sin(3*t)*heaviside(t-pi/8)  + delta(t-3)
>
> in order to transform it with LaPlace?
>

There is (currently) no way to find the laplace transform of
delta/heaviside
functions (I have only implemented inverse Laplace of polynomials using
delta functions)
LAP should return the unevaluated integral.

References:

LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco

From: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>

Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco

From: Bernard Parisse <Bernard.Parisse@UJF-GRENOBLE.FR>

Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco

From: Perez-Franco <Perez-Franco@MINDLESS.COM>

Prev: Re: LaPlace Transforms in TI89 and HP48 compared by Perez-Franco
Next: Re: LaPlace: HP's Erable 3.2 beats by far the best TI method I know
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread