Re: Volume of a 3d figure
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Volume of a 3d figure
On 17 Jan 1999 21:41:20 GMT, stl137@aol.com (STL137) wrote:
><<OK, now I think we're starting to understand each other. I asked if
>your reply had anything to do with the origional message. Just what I
>thought. It didn't. It was random noise. Wouldn't it have been much
>easier to say so STL? >>
>Do you know what a volume of revolution is? Isn't it a 3D figure? Duh.
Is it all of them? No. A volume of revolution is a limited,
sophmoric class of 3d objects. Is a walnut a volume of revolution?
No.
How did your response apply?
>
>-*---*-------
>S.T.L. ==> STL137@aol.com <== My quotes page is at: http://quote.cjb.net
>~~~ My main website is at: http://137.tsx.org ~~~
>If you see a message of mine posted on two newsgroups, then it is because I
>have replied to a crossposted message. I *never* crosspost of my own accord!
>I block all unapproved E-mail. If you wish to talk to me, post to alt.test.9
>with the subject "Moo" and your E-mail address in the body. I will allow you
>as soon as I sign on next.
>"This universe is not hostile, or yet is it friendly. It is simply
>indifferent" - John H. Holmes, The Sensible Man's View of Religion
References: