Re: TI-87

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-87

There is no TI-79 is there?  And what is this deal with the TI-87?

--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, and HTML
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, ALoomis wrote:

> No the 80, 81, and 79 are all worse
>
> Eden Cohen wrote:
> >
> > Oh 86, oh 86. You TI-86 users had the best handhelp calc until four
> > monthes ago, and now the 83+ is taking you big time. The ti-85? It was
> > better than the 83, and now it's down to being an antique. Soon after TI
> > realizes that the noble 85/86 family has been taken by the previous
> > series of TI (82/83), they will release the TI-87 which will be a souped
> > up TI-86, some sort of hybrid between the 83+ and the 89.
> > The screen resolution will be the same though for each series.
> > Watch for the 87, it will have like 250k archive memory, flash
> > technology and all that.
> >
> > So isn't the 82 the worst calc now?
>
> --
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> GE/S/M/CS d?(pu) s-:-- a17 c++>++++ U>++++ P? L>+++ E? W+
> N o? K++ w O? M- V? PS PE Y+ PGP(+) t--- 5? X-- R(-) !tv
> b+(++++) DI++++ D--- G e- h r--- x-
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>
References: