Re: Ti-86 Bug?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Ti-86 Bug?
<<No, it would be the 85 STL would reccomend, due to it's ability to do
"massive number crunching". >>
You guys know me too well.
Anyways, TIs (all of them) have a built-in floating-point limit of 14 or so
digits. Even the blessed 92+ isn't immune. It has near-arbitrary integer
precision (614 digits, baby! YEAH!) but a 14-digit floating-point limit.
Usually it's never a problem, but there are a few applications in which that
teensy error can affect a calculation massively. Fortunately, I haven't had to
do any of those applications.
By the way, I have a feeling that the men who did the Apollo project would have
killed to get a TI-92+. :-D
------
STL137@aol.com ==> Website: http://137.tsx.org <== PGP Key Finger-
print there. Front page has a new MIDI! Quotes: http://quote.cjb.net
"The better is the enemy of the good" - Voltaire
Help out the GIMPS! http://www.mersenne.org/prime.htm
Follow-Ups:
References:
- Re: Ti-86 Bug?
- From: Undetermined origin c/o LISTSERV administrator <owner-LISTSERV@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>