Re: Ti-86 Bug?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Ti-86 Bug?
From: Undetermined origin c/o LISTSERV administrator <owner-LISTSERV@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 05:29:27 GMT
Comments: RFC822 error: <W> Incorrect or incomplete address field found and ignored.
Comments: RFC822 error: <W> Incorrect or incomplete address field found and ignored.
Comments: RFC822 error: <W> Incorrect or incomplete address field found and ignored.
Comments: RFC822 error: <E> Mail origin cannot be determined.
Comments: RFC822 error: <E> Original tag data was -> (tomg@TAKEOUT.northcoast.com)
Organization: Posted via RemarQ, http://www.remarQ.com - Discussions start here!
References: <1bXf2.232$y_.662@news20.bellglobal.com> <19981222201617.00124.00000357@ng38.aol.com> <6CYf2.781$qo1.214977@client.news.psi.net>
Reply-To: Undetermined origin c/o LISTSERV administrator <owner-LISTSERV@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:27069

No, it would be the 85 STL would reccomend, due to it's ability to do
"massive number crunching".

On Wed, 23 Dec 1998 02:31:30 GMT, "SPUI"
<dem@moraseski.REMOVEima-net.com> wrote:

>I'm surprised you didn't tell him to get the 92+ :)
>
>--
>Daniel Moraseski
>http://members.xoom.com/spui/ - FL and NJ roads
>King of irrelevant info
>in Orlando, FL (A SPUI has been found at TOLL 4080 (the connector from 408
>to 417) and Valencia College Ln!)
>originally from Manalapan, NJ (near US 9 and NJ 33) (there will probably
>never be a SPUI there)
>STL137 wrote in message <19981222201617.00124.00000357@ng38.aol.com>...
>>This is a well-known problem: round-off error. Not a bug, because the
>>calculator isn't powerful enough to work with exact figures.
>>-----------
>>STL137@aol.com  ===>  Website: http://137.tsx.org <=== Find my PGP Key
>>Fingerprint there.     Quotes: http://quote.cjb.net
>>"The simplest schoolboy is now familiar with truths for which Archimedes
>would
>>have sacrificed his life" - Ernest Renan
>
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: Ti-86 Bug?

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

References:

Re: Ti-86 Bug?

From: Philipp Keller <pkiller@ANTISOCIAL.COM>

Re: Ti-86 Bug?

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

Re: Ti-86 Bug?

From: SPUI <dem@MORASESKI.REMOVEIMA-NET.COM>

Prev: Re: Ti-86 Bug?
Next: TI 89-92 et itudes de fonctions
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread