Re: TI-83+
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-83+
On 23 Apr 1999 11:30:49 GMT, jemfinch02@aol.com (Jemfinch02) wrote:
>>>>ACT = banned the 89. This is over its builtin features. I don't think
>>>>the people that run the ACT take into account programs that could run on
>>>>a calculator.
>
>>>Also, why would they ban the TI89 and not the HP48?
>
>>Uh fellah, he said it. It is because of the built in features.
>
>Obviously. But when two calculators do the exact same thing, why would one be
>banned and the other not?
>
That would be true. But both calcs do NOT do exactly the same thing.
I'll type real slow for you, read carefully. The ACT group looks at
BUILT IN features, when deciding what calcs to allow. Even with
additional software, a TI calc is still easier and faster to use.
******************************************************************
* To UNSUBSCRIBE, send an email TO: listserv@lists.ppp.ti.com
* with a message (not the subject) that reads SIGNOFF CALC-TI
*
* Archives at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/calc-ti.html
******************************************************************
Follow-Ups:
References:
- Re: TI-83+
- From: Mike Hunt <MikeHuntTROUSER@MAILROOM.COM>
- Re: TI-83+
- From: Jemfinch02 <jemfinch02@AOL.COM>