Re: TI-83+
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-83+
On 23 Apr 1999 03:26:21 GMT, jemfinch02@aol.com (Jemfinch02) wrote:
>>ACT = banned the 89. This is over its builtin features. I don't think
>>the people that run the ACT take into account programs that could run on
>>a calculator.
>
>I agree. The people at the ACT should keep up with the march of technology
and
>design their test around those capabilities.
>
>Also, why would they ban the TI89 and not the HP48? It seems crazy to me,
>although I don't complain. I use an HP48 :-)
>
>Jeremy
Uh fellah, he said it. It is because of the built in features.
******************************************************************
* To UNSUBSCRIBE, send an email TO: listserv@lists.ppp.ti.com
* with a message (not the subject) that reads SIGNOFF CALC-TI
*
* Archives at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/calc-ti.html
******************************************************************
Follow-Ups:
References:
- Re: TI-83+
- From: ToddEStan <toddestn@NOSPAM.VISI.COM>
- Re: TI-83+
- From: Jemfinch02 <jemfinch02@AOL.COM>