Re: ti-86 vs. ti-89

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: ti-86 vs. ti-89
From: Mike Hunt <MikeHuntTROUSERS@MAILROOM.COM>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 03:16:55 GMT
Organization: Posted via RemarQ, http://www.remarQ.com - Discussions start here!
References: <37055256.4030915@news.mindspring.com> <7eqdd9$r7d$1@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <3712f430.1167266@news.northcoast.com> <7eqvll$bvp$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Reply-To: Mike Hunt <MikeHuntTROUSERS@MAILROOM.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:28606

On Sun, 11 Apr 1999 16:09:23 -0400, "Indifference" <indif69@usa.net>
wrote:

>Hmmmn. Well I checked out the stats on the 89 and the 48G, and I found that
>on the 89, a large part (344K) is called "User data archive" memory. I'm
>confused as wether that is available to the user to store programs,
>variables etc. or that is just "working memory for the calc". The document
>i'm referring to is here. Somebody explain it to me, because i'm confused

It's available to the user, as archive memory.  That's why it's called
user archive memory.

-----------------------------
Remove trousers to reply.
-----------------------------

******************************************************************
* To UNSUBSCRIBE, send an email TO: listserv@lists.ppp.ti.com
* with a message (not the subject) that reads SIGNOFF CALC-TI
*
* Archives at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/calc-ti.html
******************************************************************

References:

From:

Re: ti-86 vs. ti-89

From: Indifference <indif69@USA.NET>

Re: ti-86 vs. ti-89

From: Mike Hunt <MikeHuntTROUSERS@MAILROOM.COM>

Re: ti-86 vs. ti-89

From: Indifference <indif69@USA.NET>

Prev: BASIC > ASM
Next: Re: ti-86 vs. ti-89
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread