Re: A question

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: A question
From: Freedom <citizen@UNITEDSTATES.AMERICA>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:43:15 GMT
References: <v01550102b24aa8cf98f8@[143.200.24.3]> <36252246.ABC88647@nospam.visi.com>
Reply-To: Freedom <citizen@UNITEDSTATES.AMERICA>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:25643

On Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:14:30 -0500, ToddEStan
<toddestn@nospam.visi.com> wrote:

>In most other aspects, however, you are correct.  But I still would
>expect TI's newest, greatest model to at least have the all features of
>a lesser, cheaper model.

I AGREE! I have written TI a few times requesting that the inferential
stats be included with the next ROM version for the TI-89. I have
gotten positive responses, however, TI cannot guarantee that they will
make thew stats. I'd bet they will though, especially since it means
more money for them-if they decide to establish a charge.

References:

Re: A question

From: Gary Wardall <wardallg@GBMS01.UWGB.EDU>

Re: A question

From: ToddEStan <toddestn@NOSPAM.VISI.COM>

Prev: Parallel Link
Next: Re: question about the 86 and the 89
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread