Re: AUTOEXEC
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: AUTOEXEC
Why Windows 3.1? Why not model it after Windows95 and call it WindowsTI?
Check out
http://www.ticalc.org/mailarchive/assembly-89/1998_September/msg00330.html
on what I wrote about it. I have to change a few things with the way TI-IT
works. Someone suggested a better idea that is more realistic. Anyone do
UNIX programming?
-Miles Raymond
Office Education wrote in message <36139A61.3476EBED@fisd.org>...
>HI I WAS WONDERING IF THEIR WAS A WAY TO CREAT A AUTOEXEC
>PROGRAM ON THE TI-83
>
>AND I NEED TO FIND OUT HOW TO LOCK THE PROGRAM SO
>NO ONE CAN EDIT IT
>
>MY NAME IS STEVE LORENZI
>PLEASE CAN YOU HELP ME OUT?
>
>I AM CREATING WINDOW'S 3.1. ON THE TI AND
>I NEED TO LOCK IT OUT.
>THANK YOU
Follow-Ups:
References:
- AUTOEXEC
- From: Office Education <voe18@FISD.ORG>