Re: Ti-89 Died

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Ti-89 Died
From: Tom <tomgREMOVE@NORTHCOAST.COM>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 22:03:47 GMT
Organization: http://www.supernews.com, The World's Usenet: Discussions Start Here
References: <363fe0b2.16036879@news.northcoast.com> <19981104005733.09075.00004134@ng38.aol.com>
Reply-To: Tom <tomgREMOVE@NORTHCOAST.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:26260

On 4 Nov 1998 05:57:33 GMT, stl137@aol.com (STL137) wrote:

>You're getting confused over old style ROM (you know, real ROM, the stuff you
>have to torch with a flamethrower to destroy the contents, or at least crush
>with a boot real well) with the newer PROMs and EEPROMs.
>ROMs are Etch Once Read Many.
>I "flashed" my TI-92+ "ROM" because it is EEPROM. I'd have a hell of a time
>flashing its real ROM.
>------
You seem to spend alot of time retracting statements. Last time it was
ROMs were not write once read many, but when asked which case it was
that wasn't true, (write once or read many) you didn't respond.
Again, I ask you to back up your claims, if you can.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Ti-89 Died

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

References:

Re: Ti-89 Died

From: Tom <tomgNOSPAM@NORTHCOAST.COM>

Re: Ti-89 Died

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

Prev: Re: Ti-89 Died
Next: Re: Ti-89 Died
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread