Re: Ti-89 Died
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Ti-89 Died
On Wed, 04 Nov 1998 01:21:01 GMT, tomgNOSPAM@northcoast.com (Tom)
wrote:
>Yes Todd, I do pay attention, that's why I noticed your original
>message, which you conviently didn't quote.
>But here it is:
>
>On Mon, 02 Nov 1998 16:31:52 -0600, ToddEStan
><toddestn@nospam.visi.com> wrote:
>
>>Ooops. However, I would imagine the 89 may lock up with the same
>>program that you locked your 89 with.
>
>I was merely pointing out that I agree with you that an 89 would
>probably lock up with the same program that locked up an 89. Why you
>felt it so important to point that out, I'm not at all sure.
>
>If you go back to the original message, you will see right in it that
>they said it was a 92+. Perhaps reading the messages you respond to
>might help.
>
>And you say I don't pay attention?
I believe I was the starter of this thread: and thusly I wrote the
original message and header. I do indeed have a TI-89 and that is what
I am referring to.
>
>
>On Tue, 03 Nov 1998 16:33:59 -0600, ToddEStan
><toddestn@nospam.visi.com> wrote:
>
>>Tom: Do you pay ever attention? I was commented on the the fact
>>somebody locked a calculator with a basic prog. I assumed an 89, but it
>>turned out the owner had an 92+. I then said it will probably lock an
>>89 then also.
>>
>>Todd
>>
>>> I'm sure your right, your calc will lock with the program that locked
>>> it.
>>> Is there no off postition on your genius switch?
>>
>>--
>>
>>Spam filters in place. If you are accidently blocked, remove nospam.
>
References: