Re: Why not the TI-92?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Why not the TI-92?
By your logic, I beleive the TI-85 will be the winner by far...
Todd
Jack the Klipper wrote:
>
> There have been so many threads and replies to the original message so I
> can't say the 92 is being overlooked. I think the best way to determine
> what calc's the best, you must look at all the (good) games and programs
> for each calc. (Porgrams designed esecially for the calc, not programs
> the calc can use because it is compatible with older calcs.)
> The ones with great gamed and programs probably have many useres, making
> it popular.
>
> Tomas C wrote:
>
> > >Midnight Wells wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >What is confusing me is that there appear to be very few responses
> > >listing the TI-92 as the favourite calculator
> > >
> >
> > Personally I would have to say that the TI-92 is being overlooked for
> > 2 main reasons. It's size and the fact that it hasn't been around as
> > long. The 85 and the 82 calcs have been around for 5 plus years
> > and the 83s and 86s are just improvments on them.
> >
> > Tomas C
> >
> > Ps. Even thought the excuse given for the 92 not being allowed on
> > the SATs is the qwerty keypad, I believe the truth is that they are
> > afraid of the symbolic manipulation, but we will have to see if the
> > 89s are allowed.
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
> --
> Jack the Klipper
> http://home.sol.no/~tursin/
> ICQ: 9900377
References: