Re: Why not the TI-92?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Why not the TI-92?
There have been so many threads and replies to the original message so I
can't say the 92 is being overlooked. I think the best way to determine
what calc's the best, you must look at all the (good) games and programs
for each calc. (Porgrams designed esecially for the calc, not programs
the calc can use because it is compatible with older calcs.)
The ones with great gamed and programs probably have many useres, making
it popular.
Tomas C wrote:
> >Midnight Wells wrote:
> >
> >
> >What is confusing me is that there appear to be very few responses
> >listing the TI-92 as the favourite calculator
> >
>
> Personally I would have to say that the TI-92 is being overlooked for
> 2 main reasons. It's size and the fact that it hasn't been around as
> long. The 85 and the 82 calcs have been around for 5 plus years
> and the 83s and 86s are just improvments on them.
>
> Tomas C
>
> Ps. Even thought the excuse given for the 92 not being allowed on
> the SATs is the qwerty keypad, I believe the truth is that they are
> afraid of the symbolic manipulation, but we will have to see if the
> 89s are allowed.
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
--
Jack the Klipper
http://home.sol.no/~tursin/
ICQ: 9900377
Follow-Ups:
References: