Re: TI-85
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-85
On Thu, 21 Aug 1997 06:15:47 GMT MattC0022 <mattc0022@AOL.COM> writes:
>i dont know if this makes any sense but wouldnt the newest ones have a
>higher number, and arent the higher the number the better, like
>80(oldest), 81,82,83(if they make it) 84, (if they make it) ,
>85,86,etc
>and finally 92(newest) maybe i am wrong but who really cares
in FUNCTIONALITY yes that's true lowest 80 to highes 92.. but the ORDER
that the ti8x's came out.. is all jacked :) like ti80 then 82 then 85
81 came somewhere there then 92 then 83 then 86 and each of them had
they're own ROM upgrades..
---
-nXt
nxt@geocities.com http://nxt.home.ml.org OR:
nxt@juno.com
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Way/6521
Follow-Ups:
- Re: TI-85
- From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>
References:
- Re: TI-85
- From: Elwood Gruschow <gruschow@PRAIRIENET.ORG>
- Re: TI-85
- From: MattC0022 <mattc0022@AOL.COM>