Re: TI-85
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-85
No the order goes like this;
85, 82, 92, 83, 86 (I have no clue where the 80 and 81 go)
-Mike
http://www.geocities.com/~mikesworld
http://pezpage.home.ml.org
PHC wrote:
>
> MattC0022 wrote:
> >
> > i dont know if this makes any sense but wouldnt the newest ones have a
> > higher number, and arent the higher the number the better, like
> > 80(oldest), 81,82,83(if they make it) 84, (if they make it) , 85,86,etc
> > and finally 92(newest) maybe i am wrong but who really cares
>
> Actually, it is based on the power of the calc. I think the calc's were
> produced in the following order: 80, 81, 85, 82, 83, 92, 86.
> --
> PHC
> paulhc@networkusa.net
> http://members.aol.com/agentphc/
Follow-Ups:
References:
- Re: TI-85
- From: Elwood Gruschow <gruschow@PRAIRIENET.ORG>
- Re: TI-85
- From: MattC0022 <mattc0022@AOL.COM>
- Re: TI-85
- From: PHC <paulhc@NETWORKUSA.NET>