RE: A92: Geometry

To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: RE: A92: Geometry
From: CADI <cadi@internet-club.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 1998 08:19:45 +0200
Delivered-To: assembly-92-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org

I have the TI-92II since a year and I also do not use the Geometry. So do my
friends.
I did not understand your mail! The TI-92II is faster than the TI-92+?
Why did you get the 92+ module from TI for testing? Can everybody get it?

CADI

At 14:09 28.03.1998 -0000, you wrote:
>i agree with you that the 92 is not only made for assembly programmers
>but everyone who own a 92 enjoy assembly programs even if he doesn't
>program himself.
>i'm using my 92 a lot in mathematics at school and i enjoy doing
>calculus with it because it's nice and very useful but i never used it
>for geometry problems
>i understand what you meant when you said that more features, more
>people buy 92+, ... but note that you were wrong when you said that i'll
>buy the 92+ module only for the memory because i won't have to buy it
>because i've already one 92+ module (i got onefrom ti in order to
>testing it) and because i'm using a lot the differential equation
>solving  and units features (which are really great)... (but maybe i'll
>buy a second 92+ module for my second ti92 (a 92 II, much faster than
>the 92+ !))
>
>i said that the geometry was unsuseful because i know a lot of people
>who own a 92 and nobody uses the geometry so that i was convinced that
>nobody at all uses it - you proved me that it's false, thanx!
>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De:	Anton Ivanov [SMTP:ivanova@ucs.orst.edu]
>> Date:	samedi 28 mars 1998 14:54
>> À:	assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
>> Objet:	Re: A92: Geometry
>> 
>> 
>> Yo Yo, Geometry is a cool thing!
>> It may hurt your ego, but the calculator isn't developed as an
>> assembly programming toy for people with too much time on their hands.
>> It has other uses, you know.
>> 
>> I do agree that some features could be better, a lot better, but not
>> at the expense of geometry or other features.  Look at it this way:
>> the more features, the more people buy the calcs, the
>> happier TI is, the better calcs they make...
>> 
>> I mean, you'll be buying the plus module because it gives you memory,
>> not because of differential equations and enhanced geometry, right?
>> So you might as well say, well why do they put it
>> there in the first place?  Because other people use these things too!
>> 
>> So, everyone, stop whining about this
>> 
>> Christophe GIAUME wrote:
>> 
>> > i bought my first ti92 2.5 years ago and i've *NEVER* used the
>> geometry (i used it only once a few days after i got my first ti92)
>> > i think ti's developpers should spent more time on increasing
>> text/prgm editor's speed, on integrating a real assembly programming
>> solution in the 92+ module... and just remove the geometry
>> >
>> > CG
>> > -----
>> >
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --
>> >
>> >    Part 1.2       Type: application/ms-tnef
>> >               Encoding: base64
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>