[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: A92: TI ANNOUNCES NEW CALC!!!!!
Personally, I don't care what number they call it. If they come out
with a more powerful TI-8x Calc, then that's their problem of choosing a
number. I'm sure they had a reason for that number that is beyond what
we can see.
>----------
>From: ViRaL mAlFuNcTiOn[SMTP:diddy@apci.net]
>Reply To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
>Sent: Saturday, March 14, 1998 11:09 AM
>To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: Re: A92: TI ANNOUNCES NEW CALC!!!!!
>
>
>>Non-sequitur-post
>>______________________
>>
>>>so...who else here is a collector? i've only got a broken 85 and a 92
>>>so far (not that rich), but i'm planning on getting as many as i can.
>>
>>I'm now in 9th grade.
>>
>>In 7th grade, I got myself a ti-85.
>>in 8th grade, i got myself a ti-92.
>>in 9th grade, I got myself a ti-86.
>>probably, I'll get both the ti-92 plus and the ti-89
>>
>>oh, and one more thing, why didn't they leave room to upgrade the numbers?
>>If the 89 is replaced, they'll be forced to call it 89+.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>I'm in 9th Grade Also
>
>In 7th Grade, I got a 82
>In 8th Grade, I got a 85, and an 83
>In 9th Grade, I got a 86, and a 92
>In 10th grade I will get a, ti-92 + and a TI-89
>
>about the numbering scheme... maybe that means that all ti calcs from now
>will be horizontal instead of vertical. they should have called it the 87 or
>the 88... and a note with the ti-73 if it has 64K of ram for application
>space, shouldn't you be able to hack that ram for use as normal RAM.. for
>like use for more games or programs? That would mean that you would have...
>(mentally adds numbers) 98K of ram... I think taht they should have put
>asm on the TI-73 personally, and save all of the hackers the trouble.. I
>mean they will eventually hack thru it anyway.
>
>ViRtUaL mAlFuNcTiOn
>
>