Re: A92: P-92 !?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A92: P-92 !?
Pascal Sueess wrote:
> David Kühling wrote
> >
> > Kyle Stemen wrote:
> >
> > > I would like it if we could make a standard language such as C.
>
Actually I ment to say ansi-C. The only reason it isn't now is because it isn't finished,
and I have discontinued it. I will recontinue it once I get enough people who know how to
help, and are willing to help.
> >
> > The language shoudn't be "such as C", but perfectly C-like (ANSI
> > C-standard?),(perhaps C++), so that normal C-programs can be
> > compiled, which where originaly
> > designed for amiga or pc. (Actually I don't think, that there are any > good programs
> > programed with pascal,
>
> I don't think that there are so many old programs which you can
> take 1:1 to the TI-92 and will make sense there.
>
> >because pascal is a quite impractical and restricted
> > language,
> > and consist 50% of dummy key words, such as ord or chr.)
>
> (Object) Pascal is a good and clear language, neither
> impractical nor restricted.
> May you have to type one or two letters more than in C,
> but I still prefer it to the "spagetthi language" C!
>
I have programmed in C, and Pascal. I think they are ok bases, but C++ is more devolped
because more people use it. I would prefer C since it is the more common language.
> Pascal
References: