Re: LF: ***** Greyscale experts...READ THIS NOW (PLEASE) ******
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LF: ***** Greyscale experts...READ THIS NOW (PLEASE) ******
Yeah, but even 3 pictures in greyscale should not take 30k of ram.
it goes like this:
On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Eric Gross wrote:
(240Witdh/8Pixels/Byte)*128*3=23040 bytes.
And that is the worst case. Then there is some code. But if there is more
1 k I`ll be suprised.
> At 11:42 AM 12/4/96 +0100, you wrote:
> >
> >No, but look at that 30k piccy of sandra bullock. Compression is needed
> >until 4meg TI-92s are the norm of the day. 30k for a 3color raw picture
> >that is absurd. By the way i will release a library for fargo that will
> >decompress pictures. Included will be a little program to compress TI92
> >vars. The routine should be fast and efficient.
>
>
> That pis is 30k because you can scroll down. It has the equivalent amount of
> 3 pics.
>
Follow-Ups:
References: