Yeah, but OC is fibre-optic, and usually T3/T1's come on twisted pair. Now, if I'm wrong, I'd be glad to hear about it, but I'm gonna trust the tech guy until otherwise proved.
Mark E. Scott Jr.
mscott@databasecity.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Rabeler [mailto:rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 2:22 PM
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
Yes, sorry.. you did say 192 * T3. So you say a T3 = OC-1?
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 2:16 PM
Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> Did I ever say it was 192 * T1? I thought I said 192 * T3. If I did,
> my bad. This info is verified by our network guru now, so I'm 99% sure
> on it. These kinds of speeds are just plain unimaginable for one
> person. The only way you can make use of it is by many many computers
> hooked up to a very expensive switch. Anyways, I'm starting to put
> together my site for 89 roms. Maybe it'll turn into other stuff as my
> ASM programs come along.
>
> Mark E. Scott Jr.
> mscott@databasecity.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Rabeler [mailto:rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu]
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 2:10 PM
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
>
> Ok, but you can't say an OC192 = 192 * T1.
>
> Bryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 2:05 PM
> Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
>
> > But a T3 isn't 51.84mbit/sec, its 45. I know that one, for a long
> time
> > our whole connection only was 45mbit/sec.
> >
> > Mark E. Scott Jr.
> > mscott@databasecity.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bryan Rabeler [mailto:rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu]
> > Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 2:01 PM
> > To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
> >
> >
> > Well, Magnus said before an OC-1 is 51.84mbit/sec, not 45mbit/sec.
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
> > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 1:49 PM
> > Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> >
> >
> > > My understanding is that an OC192 is equivalent to 192 T3 lines.
> One
> > T3
> > > line is about 45 mbit/sec, therefore you come up with a grand total
> of
> > > 8640 mbit/s. Just a quick divide by 1000 yields 8.64 gbit/sec,
> > roughly.
> > > I know the number isn't exact, but should be oftly close.
> > >
> > > Mark E. Scott Jr.
> > > mscott@databasecity.com
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Serial [mailto:Serial@earthlink.net]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 8:10 PM
> > > To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > > Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > >
> > >
> > > I believe his math is wrong. The OC256 that at&t is laying across
> the
> > > atlantic to connect the 2 continents is a 2 gbit line which would
> > > roughly be
> > > ~200meg/s
> > > the quick conversion for (g)(m)(k)bits/s is to just add 2 zero's and
> > > reduce
> > > to a lower letter if nessessary.
> > > for example. a 56kbit modem like an x2 is really 5.6 kilobytes max
> > > downstream
> > > and a 384k/s downstream dsl would be ~38.4 kilobytes /s
> > > a 1mbit cable line would be 100kilobytes per second. etc.
> > > I may not know how to do anything but hello world in asm but
> > networking
> > > I do
> > > know =]
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > > [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Bryan
> Rabeler
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 3:17 PM
> > > To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > > Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > How did you calculate that?
> > >
> > > Bryan
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
> > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:46 PM
> > > Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Around 8.5gbps if my math is correct. Equivalent to 192 T3 lines.
> > > >
> > > > Mark E. Scott Jr.
> > > > mscott@databasecity.com
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Bryan Rabeler [mailto:rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:34 PM
> > > > To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > > > Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > How fast is an OC192 again?
> > > >
> > > > Bryan
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
> > > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:06 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Send me the roms in an email and I'll throw em on a server
> that's
> > on
> > > > an
> > > > > OC192.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mark E. Scott Jr.
> > > > > mscott@databasecity.com
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Olle Hedman [mailto:oh@hem.passagen.se]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:02 PM
> > > > > To: asm89
> > > > > Subject: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This week might be the last one I distribute old ti-roms.
> > > > > Someone has reported me to abuse@liu.se (my university), and to
> > TI.
> > > > > Same someone did not contact me.
> > > > > I recieved the call from "abuse" today. He was very nice and
> > > > > understanding and I
> > > > > think he thought it was quite silly, but that he just had to
> talk
> > > with
> > > > > me
> > > > > because of this letter.
> > > > > I got a week to either remove them, or come up with a valid
> reason
> > > for
> > > > > me to
> > > > > continue having them.
> > > > > I have yet not gotten any response from TI, but they have
> visited
> > my
> > > > > site.
> > > > > I'm eagerly awaiting their letter :)
> > > > >
> > > > > //Olle
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>