Re: A89: int vs. short int

Re: A89: int vs. short int

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: int vs. short int
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
• Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 12:45:51 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <FIEFLCDGPDLJPCHPCNKFMELHCAAA.simba@inyc.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

At 08:39 2000-12-30, you wrote:
>Isn't in TI-89 land int and short are absolutely the same? So seeing short
>in one place and int in another makes things a bit strange. Or have I buried
>myself under a depth of ignorance?

Yes on 16bit systems like 68k int and short is the same size,
just as int and long is the same size in 32 bit systems.
int is processor dependant, short and long isn't (as far as I know)

///Olle

• Re: A89: int vs. short int
• From: "Sebastian Reichelt" <SebastianR@gmx.de>

• A89: int vs. short int
• From: "Alex Astashyn" <simba@inyc.com>

• Prev: A89: Re: int vs. short int
• Next: Re: A89: int vs. short int
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread