A89: int vs. short int

A89: int vs. short int

• To: "Assembly-89@Lists. Ticalc. Org" <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: A89: int vs. short int
• From: "Alex Astashyn" <simba@inyc.com>
• Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 02:39:25 -0500
• Importance: Normal
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

In many source codes for TIGCC, (including Zeljko's docs) i see people use
short instead of int.
Isn't in TI-89 land int and short are absolutely the same? So seeing short
in one place and int in another makes things a bit strange. Or have I buried
myself under a depth of ignorance?

And again,
Thanks to Xavier Vassor and all TIGCC team for the really awsome product.
Thanks to Zeljko for his work, without which I would not be able to do any
of my projects.
Also, I thank Sebastian for his kindly effort in fixing the command line
support in Win2k.

...And all people here who take time to help each other out.

Sinerely,
Alex Astashyn

• A89: Re: int vs. short int
• From: "Sebastian Reichelt" <SebastianR@gmx.de>
• Re: A89: int vs. short int
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>

• Prev: A89: Re: Re: TIGCC and a new Question
• Next: A89: Re: Re: Re: TIGCC and a new Question
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread