A89: Re: Re: Re: CORRECTION: Shift+ON
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
A89: Re: Re: Re: CORRECTION: Shift+ON
Hi!
> You were correct on many of them, and a few of them were
> only a little off.
In fact, some names are picked from Gareth James's info files.
> Because of the NDA, I don't think TI would like us telling
> you what the real names are, but, believe me, we are trying
> our hardest to get you included in the beta (maybe even late
> alpha) testing.
Thanks: I just received a call from TI. But I am afraid about
one thing: their SDK will obviously be a supplement to TIGCC,
not a replacement for it. The contract which I must sign to
become a tester will probably force me to stop developing
TIGCCLIB, because TIGCC is a concurence to their SDK. This is
not good. At the moment, TIGCCLIB 2.1 is a bit buggy, so I
need to prepare TIGCCLIB 2.2 with some bugfixes. But I am
afraid that it will be illegal.
Cheers,
Zeljko Juric