A89: AMS v2.01 - October?

A89: AMS v2.01 - October?

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: A89: AMS v2.01 - October?
• From: Andrew Magness <AndrewM@ev1.net>
• Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 06:35:44 -0800
• In-Reply-To: <001b01bf3a23$6fdec500$165ffea9@dew>
• References: <0.62dca940.257331c5@aol.com> <000601bf3a15$384c1e20$775dfea9@kormoc> <00fe01bf3a15$d2b896a0$82b30e04@juanscpu> <00af01bf3a1f$209e36a0$2e87b2d1@serial> <012501bf3a1f$b47f44e0$82b30e04@juanscpu> <00c301bf3a22$dc2e8ac0$2e87b2d1@serial>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Did anyone notice the date on this rom? October?????? Why has it been held
back so long?


Andrew

• A89: Re: AMS v2.01 - October?
• From: "Niklas Brunlid" <e96nbr@efd.lth.se>
• Re: A89: AMS v2.01 - October?
• From: "Bryan E Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>

• Re: A89: AMS v2.01 and VTI
• From: JHill8075@aol.com
• Re: A89: AMS v2.01 and VTI
• From: "Rob Smith" <kormoc@netzero.net>
• Re: A89: AMS v2.01 and VTI
• From: "h4X0r" <haxor89@netzero.net>
• Re: A89: AMS v2.01 and VTI
• From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
• Re: A89: AMS v2.01 and VTI
• From: "h4X0r" <haxor89@netzero.net>
• Re: A89: AMS v2.01 and VTI
• From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
• Re: A89: AMS v2.01 and VTI
• From: "Daniel Wood" <thedew@usit.net>

• Prev: A89: Re: Re: Basically the entire digest
• Next: A89: Re: AMS v2.01 - October?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread