Re: A89: C-Compiler, was: re Hal for the Ti89
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: C-Compiler, was: re Hal for the Ti89
Check in the Dos Utilities/ASM stuff folder in your favorite TI archive site.
I cannot find the original small-C, only the 85 modified version, but it has
the source code included with it.
-Patrick
psweeney@geocities.com
Javier wrote:
> Where can I reach this small C??
> Thanks
> Javier
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Patrick Sweeney <psweeney@geocities.com>
> Para: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Fecha: Jueves 18 de Marzo de 1999 20:18 p.m.
> Asunto: Re: A89: C-Compiler, was: re Hal for the Ti89
>
> >
> >Are those libraries REALLY needed?
> >Yes, if we wanted to port true C code, but as a tool for making assembly
> >easier, we don't.
> >If you look at Small C for the TI-85 they (Jeremy) just ported all the
> ZShell
> >and USGARD libraries and functions, which seems to have worked OK.
> >BTW, that compiler (Small C), has a 68k port, we would just have to
> customize
> >it slightly.
> >-Patrick
> >psweeney@geocities.com
> >sweenp@rpi.edu
> >
> >
> >Tim Boescke wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> >In a message dated 3/18/99 06:00:36 Eastern Standard Time,
> boescke@gmx.net
> >> >writes:
> >> >
> >> >> (The biggest part of work is still to come: Programming the standard
> >> >> libraries)
> >> >>
> >> >why not incorporate the libraries used on the calc (graphlib, util,
> etc)?
> >> >that would provide a fair amount of the functions you would use.
> >>
> >> This shouldnt be a problem. But still the standard Ansi-C libs are
> required
> >> for compatibility reasons. (at least stdlib.h,stdio.h and malloc.h)
> >
> >
References: