RE: A89: C-Compiler, was: re Hal for the Ti89

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: RE: A89: C-Compiler, was: re Hal for the Ti89
From: "Javier" <grijalba@cvtci.com.ar>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 00:56:33 -0300
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Where  can I reach this small C??
Thanks
Javier

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Patrick Sweeney <psweeney@geocities.com>
Para: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Fecha: Jueves 18 de Marzo de 1999 20:18 p.m.
Asunto: Re: A89: C-Compiler, was: re Hal for the Ti89


>
>Are those libraries REALLY needed?
>Yes, if we wanted to port true C code, but as a tool for making assembly
>easier, we don't.
>If you look at Small C for the TI-85 they (Jeremy) just ported all the
ZShell
>and USGARD libraries and functions, which seems to have worked OK.
>BTW, that compiler (Small C), has a 68k port, we would just have to
customize
>it slightly.
>-Patrick
>psweeney@geocities.com
>sweenp@rpi.edu
>
>
>Tim Boescke wrote:
>
>> >
>> >In a message dated 3/18/99 06:00:36 Eastern Standard Time,
boescke@gmx.net
>> >writes:
>> >
>> >> (The biggest part of work is still to come: Programming the standard
>> >>  libraries)
>> >>
>> >why not incorporate the libraries used on the calc (graphlib, util,
etc)?
>> >that would provide a fair amount of the functions you would use.
>>
>> This shouldnt be a problem. But still the standard Ansi-C libs are
required
>> for compatibility reasons. (at least stdlib.h,stdio.h and malloc.h)
>
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: C-Compiler, was: re Hal for the Ti89

From: Patrick Sweeney <psweeney@geocities.com>