Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
I'm an engineering student, the class is twice as large as it should be. :)
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cassady Roop" <croop@oregontrail.net>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
>
> The glass is not half full nor half empty; it's poison, don't drink it!
>
> Cassady Roop
>
> Bryan Rabeler wrote:
> >
> > They are ALL pessimistic? :)
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Cyong0@aol.com>
> > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 12:10 AM
> > Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
> >
> > >
> > > In a message dated 12/15/1999 9:04:54 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> > > rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu writes:
> > >
> > > << Ok, now I'm having trouble figuring out which e-mail you are
replying
> > to
> > > here... what did I say that was pessimistic?
> > >
> > > Bryan >>
> > >
> > > hehehe, please read your last 5-10 e-mails to the board.
> > >
> > >
>
>
References: