Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
They are ALL pessimistic? :)
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: <Cyong0@aol.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 12:10 AM
Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
>
> In a message dated 12/15/1999 9:04:54 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu writes:
>
> << Ok, now I'm having trouble figuring out which e-mail you are replying
to
> here... what did I say that was pessimistic?
>
> Bryan >>
>
> hehehe, please read your last 5-10 e-mails to the board.
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: