Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
yes but 92plus's can do greyscale, and are compatable with pretty much all
89 (modified)games
-Dan
thedew@usit.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
>
> But all TI-92 Plus calcs are HW2...
>
> Bryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Wood" <thedew@usit.net>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 10:31 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
>
>
> >
> > I'll trade my hw1 89 WITH games for a sealed 92plus, you pay shipping.
> >
> > -Dan
> > thedew@usit.net
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
> > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 9:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Then in that case. I'll sell you a Hw1 calc for $250
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <Cyong0@aol.com>
> > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 7:03 PM
> > > Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
> > >
> > >
> > > |
> > > | I have an HW 2 calc, but I can't simply "return" it since all I can
> get
> > > back
> > > | is another HW 2 calcs. HW 1 calcs are rare, and the only ones I can
> buy
> > > are
> > > | used and usually have major flaws in them (Hey, it just is hard to
> find
> > > | somebody willing to give up a good conditioned SF2 playing, Super
> Mario
> > > | Brothers playing, HW 1 calc, unless they are giving up their
academic
> > > career,
> > > | or are planning on committing suicide in the near future)
> > > |
> > > | There has to be SOME way to make it work on HW 2 since there isn't
any
> > > | grayscale or anything. I hope people start programming stuff for HW
2
> > > | because I can learn how to program, but I dunno how to make changes
to
> > the
> > > | way I program to adapt to hardware I don't know about:P
> > > |
> > > | All you genius programmers out there I think are able to tho:P
> > > |
> > > | -Trailblazer
> > > |
> > > |
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: