Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?

Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?

• To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: "Daniel Wood" <thedew@usit.net>
• Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:49:39 -0600
• References: <0.d8237d23.2589b06d@aol.com> <002b01bf4774$8e2c2760$8988b2d1@serial> <008701bf4776$0c6e6e20$0100a8c0@dew> <011301bf4782$80432d70$790f0923@valpo.edu> <010101bf4783$eb7ed930$0100a8c0@dew> <01f701bf4784$55ae1370$790f0923@valpo.edu>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

thats my understanding.

-Dan
thedew@usit.net

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?


> 
> TI-92 Plus calculators can do grayscale?  Are you sure?  So its just the
> TI-89 HW2 and not the TI-92 Plus HW2 that can't do grayscale?
> 
> Bryan

• Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>

• Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: Cyong0@aol.com
• Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
• Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: "Daniel Wood" <thedew@usit.net>
• Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
• Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: "Daniel Wood" <thedew@usit.net>
• Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>

• Prev: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• Next: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread