Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
btw: it would have to include a service merchandise recept and 1 year
waranty from service merchandise.
:)
-Dan
thedew@usit.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Wood" <thedew@usit.net>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
>
> I'll trade my hw1 89 WITH games for a sealed 92plus, you pay shipping.
>
> -Dan
> thedew@usit.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 9:20 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
>
>
> >
> > Then in that case. I'll sell you a Hw1 calc for $250
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Cyong0@aol.com>
> > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 7:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
> >
> >
> > |
> > | I have an HW 2 calc, but I can't simply "return" it since all I can
get
> > back
> > | is another HW 2 calcs. HW 1 calcs are rare, and the only ones I can
buy
> > are
> > | used and usually have major flaws in them (Hey, it just is hard to
find
> > | somebody willing to give up a good conditioned SF2 playing, Super
Mario
> > | Brothers playing, HW 1 calc, unless they are giving up their academic
> > career,
> > | or are planning on committing suicide in the near future)
> > |
> > | There has to be SOME way to make it work on HW 2 since there isn't any
> > | grayscale or anything. I hope people start programming stuff for HW 2
> > | because I can learn how to program, but I dunno how to make changes to
> the
> > | way I program to adapt to hardware I don't know about:P
> > |
> > | All you genius programmers out there I think are able to tho:P
> > |
> > | -Trailblazer
> > |
> > |
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
References: