I'm sorry, in my haste to get that thing written out, I didn't clarify. Like you say, I meant it is quicker to design and implement, but MS Visual C++ creates a better and more efficient program.
Mark E. Scott Jr.
mscott@databasecity.com
-----Original Message-----
From: h4X0r [mailto:haxor89@netzero.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 7:54 PM
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: A89: Re: Re: My Linking Cable Software Project
My Linking Cable Software ProjectI think he meant "design-wise." Also he
must be using Microsoft Visual C++. 'Cause in Borland its just about the
same.
--h4X0r
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Boescke
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 5:51 PM
Subject: A89: Re: My Linking Cable Software Project
VB (Basic) is _quicker_ than C++ ? for sure not.
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Scott
To: 'assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org'
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 6:29 AM
Subject: A89: My Linking Cable Software Project
I'm not much of a 68k programmer, but I am writing a program to link to the
89 on the PC. I don't know if it will end up being as good as w32tran8x 4,
but I'm gonna try to finish it. One thing I have never attempted is talking
to ports on the computer. Does anybody know if there is a good guide for
either Visual C++ or Visual Basic? I plan on doing it in C++, but VB is
quicker, so who knows. The main reason I intend on making this is to get
all the functionality of TI's
__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html