Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
That's silly, no one has a HW 2 calc. :)
I had a HW 2 TI-89, and I returned it, but I know what you're talking about.
I'll try to make it a s "friendly" as possible.
--h4X0r
----- Original Message -----
From: <Cyong0@aol.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
>
> If a shell is made, PLEASE make it compatible with Hardware Version
2.00!!!
>
> That is sort of the whole point since ams v2.03 was meant to run on 2.00:P
>
> Thanx!
>
> -Trailblazer
>
>
__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
References: