Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?

Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: Cyong0@aol.com
• Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 21:54:28 EST
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

If a shell is made, PLEASE make it compatible with Hardware Version 2.00!!!

That is sort of the whole point since ams v2.03 was meant to run on 2.00:P

Thanx!

-Trailblazer

• Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: "h4X0r" <haxor89@netzero.net>
• Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>

• Prev: A89: WARNING TO USERS OF AMS 2.03
• Next: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread