Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
Probably, but I'm just making it work with AMS 2.03 for now.
--h4X0r
----- Original Message -----
From: <TurboSoft@aol.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
>
> In a message dated 12/15/99 8:41:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> haxor89@netzero.net writes:
>
> > I have been looking over the source code to Launch and Shell (the
PlusShell
> > Browser), and it seems rather simple. If anyone has any suggestions,
or
> > comments don't hesitate to email the list or myself (preferred).
> >
> > --h4X0r
>
> is there a way to define some stuff in the shell (whatever coding that
would
> be needed) to run old ASM programs?
>
> --TurboSoft
>
> Visit the TURBOSOFT HOMEPAGE: The most current Basic and C programs
created
> by TurboSoft for the 89, and the most 89 web links.
> <A HREF="http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/">http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/</A>
>
>
__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
References: