Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
From: TurboSoft@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 20:51:56 EST
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

In a message dated 12/15/99 8:41:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
haxor89@netzero.net writes:

> I have been looking over the source code to Launch and Shell (the PlusShell
>  Browser), and it seems rather simple.  If anyone has any suggestions, or
>  comments don't hesitate to email the list or myself (preferred).
>  
>  --h4X0r

is there a way to define some stuff in the shell (whatever coding that would 
be needed) to run old ASM programs?

--TurboSoft

Visit the TURBOSOFT HOMEPAGE:  The most current Basic and C programs created 
by TurboSoft for the 89, and the most 89 web links.
<A HREF="http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/">http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/</A>

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?

From: "h4X0r" <haxor89@netzero.net>

Prev: A89: Re: My Linking Cable Software Project
Next: A89: Sign up for AMS 2.03 Shell Beta
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread