Re: A89: RE: rom checksum

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: RE: rom checksum
From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 20:14:15 -0600
References: <004001bf4375$d2fa0ae0$db02e0c7@desktop>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


I thought this was fairly recent, like within the last 2 months...

Bryan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Noveck" <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: A89: RE: rom checksum


>
> >But who's to say it has to be a 56-bit RSA?  Didn't the government just
> >approve Netscape's 128-bit encryption to be exported outside the U.S.?
And
> >besides, TI has a French unit too.  They could do the encryption stuff in
> >France and ship to the U.S.
>
> The Netscape thing was a mistake -- that's a press release from 1997
> (loooong ago), and it ONLY allowed 128 bit encryption transfers btw.
> Netscape browsers and secure servers
>
>     -Scott
>
>
>

References:

Re: A89: RE: rom checksum

From: "Scott Noveck" <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>